The Importance of This Marvelous Work and a Wonder^® to National and World Security

From Christopher:

The Importance of This Marvelous Work and a Wonder^® to National and World Security :-)

A warning to the non-LDS world!

That's right!

This MWAW has more potential of securing the freedoms promised to the people of the United States and the other people of the world than any other work currently available to the public. :-)

This is why:

A good majority of the most powerful positions held inside the FBI, the CIA, Homeland Security, and the United States Government are held by active members of the LDS Church. These agencies do much of their recruiting at Brigham Young University, catering to return LDS missionaries who speak foreign languages and are already intensely inculcated in following rules and orders of their superiors. And it is possible that one day in the near future, a member of the LDS Church will occupy the most powerful (ostensibly) position in the entire world. Mitt Romney is an active member of the LDS faith. Chances are high that he will be running for United States President in 2012.

Here is a personal example of how the LDS mentality of those who wield power in government positions of authority affects the supposed freedoms and rights granted to the citizens of the United States:

I filed a defamation civil lawsuit against a few defendants who communicated, orally and in writing, information about me that exposed me to public hatred, contempt, and ridicule. Here is the Utah Criminal Law that supports these civil actions:

Utah Criminal Code 76-9-404. Criminal defamation.
(1) A person is guilty of criminal defamation if he knowingly communicates to any person orally or in writing any information which he knows to be false and knows will tend to expose any other living person to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.
(2) Criminal defamation is a class B misdemeanor.

I filed these suits in the Third District Court of the State of Utah. One against the LDS Church, two of its apostles, Senator Bob Bennett, and members of the Ida Smith family. (For sake of plainness and brevity, I'll call this suit "vs. LDS".) The other suit was filed against an author and his pubishers of a book about polygamy, John Lewellyn, and a public organization that scrutinized polygamist activities, Tapestry Against Polygamy, and others involved with these defendants. (I'll call this suit, "vs. Author".)

I filed the vs. Author suit first. An LDS judge, Stephen L. Roth, was assigned to the case. I filed a motion to recuse Judge Roth, petitioning the court to replace him with a non-LDS judge owing to the sensitivity of the material in the case. The Presiding Judge at the time, Paul G. Maughn, responded with a ruling that basically supported his denial of the motion because "most of the Judges sitting on the Third District Court bench are LDS."

Then the irony happened:

When I filed the vs. LDS suit, Judge Maughn was assigned the case. He promptly recused himself because he was LDS and "intimately acquainted with many of the defendants." He assigned the case to one of the non-LDS judges with the least seniority. Those who understand court politics should realize the effect that a personal assignment given by the presiding judge has on a new and less-senior judge. Why didn't Maughn assign the case to another LDS judge, if he was confident that the LDS judges could oversee similar cases without bias? Was Judge Maughn's ruling in refusing my motion to recuse an LDS judge non-binding on his decision to appoint a non-LDS judge to replace him? Why couldn't Judge Maughn have remained on the suit against the LDS Church? Does he not trust his own ability to remain unbiased?

Needless to say, after I filed the suit vs. LDS, the demeanor of some of the other judges handling my pro-se (one who represents him or herself) cases changed. They begin to scrutinize me more closely and limit my ability to represent myself by ruling against insignificant technicalities that they would have otherwise ignored in a self-representation situation. Nevertheless, no judge, on the record, ever denied me the ability to pursue justice, nor did any mandate that I not file any suit.

When I filed my first petition in the Third District Court in the State of Utah, the court security was put on "high alert." The hearing was held in front of Commissioner Patrick Casey. It involved my rights to visit my children. There were five (5), that's right, 5 Sheriff's Deputies assigned to the courtroom that day, anticipating the "high security risk" the court perceived it would need when I came to court. There was no basis for this heightened security, except the prejudiced and biased perception that Utah Court Authorities have against anyone who makes claims that parallel the LDS founder, Joseph Smith Jr.. :-)

Why shouldn't they have perceived me as crazy and a threat to society?

I claim that a resurrected being appeared to me and gave me the assignment to translate the gold plates, claiming possession of two stones to help in the translation and to communicate with advanced human beings.

I claim to be assisted by John the Beloved and the Three Nephites and other resurrected beings in establishing a work that undermines all orthodox religion and belief systems.

I claim to be the ONLY man assigned by our mutual Creators to be a true messenger and present the world with a message that will help it.

Why should the LDS-dominated society found in and around Salt Lake City, Utah, fear me...

... I am exactly like the founder of their own religion, Joseph Smith Jr.. :-)

But this obvious bias against me (a virtual unknown in the public venue of politics and religion) is not the main reason why LDS members serving in positions of authority over others threaten the security and freedoms that we all hold dear. There are viable and logical reasons why no active LDS person should be elected or appointed to such powerful positions.

The media hardly takes notice of me and this MWAW because they look at me as a deceiver, a manipulator, crazy, not giving any credit to the claims of this work. The media gives no credence to the many active LDS members who have embraced this work and left the LDS religion for a more freeing and liberal attitude that makes them better citizens to the world. They give them no credibility because the reporters and editors look at the people who have accepted this MWAW has "crazy" and "demented" members of a cult. :-)

Yet, when it comes to covering the election or an appointment of an LDS politician or bureaucrat to a position of power and authority in the government, the media conveniently (somehow blindly) forget that the LDS people believe in the EXACT SAME CLAIMS MADE BY ME AND THIS WORK. Of course, it's much easier for the media to turn a blind eye to what the LDS people believe, because Joseph Smith isn't around making the claims that he made in the early 1800's. But the LDS people today accept the exact claims as ultimate truth as the people who believed them in Joseph Smith's day.

Yet these claims are still not the main reasons why no active LDS person can be trusted with power over another's life.

The following are the two main reasons, which are unique to the LDS faith:

The LDS men believe that they have "the power of the priesthood." LDS Apostle Boyd K. Packer recently described to the world what this "power" entails:

"The priesthood is the authority and the power that God has granted to men on earth to act for Him. When priesthood authority is exercised properly, priesthood bearers do what God would do if He were present." (See the Salt Lake Deseret News, April 3, 2010)

Every LDS male, from age 12 to the end of their life, believes that he has the "authority and the power of God," and that what he does is as if God Himself is doing it. No other people upon this earth believe that "God's power" is so widely and liberally distributed among mortals. Most believe that God has given his power and authority to some men, such as the Catholic Pope, clerics, and other religious leaders, but no others believe that "God's power" is held in the hands of the common man like the LDS priesthood holders do. The LDS actually believe that they know the will of God, and when they act in the power of their priesthood, everything they do is sanctioned and condoned by the Creator of all humankind!

Consider how these beliefs can affect the mind of a male filled with pride, ego, testosterone, and self-importance.

The second reason is the unique LDS belief that all human beings have the power and ability (male and female) to have a personal relationship with God and Jesus, the Christ, and CAN RECEIVE PERSONAL GUIDANCE DIRECTLY FROM GOD AT ANYTIME TO INFLUENCE THEM IN THEIR THOUGHTS AND ACTIONS.

No people on earth abuse the ability to receive instruction from God like the LDS people. In their circles, it is often heard, "Heavenly Father told me this," "Heavenly Father inspired me to do this and that." "Heavenly Father wants us to do such and such." "Heavenly Father" this, "Heavenly Father" that. It is incredible how often the LDS people make these types of comments. Before everything that they do, LDS people pray to be guided by the "spirit of the Lord" and to "do the will of our Father in heaven."

Consider how this mentality affects the personal decisions of the LDS people. And since the LDS people have their own idea of how a person should and shouldn't act in accordance to "God's will," when another person is not acting according to LDS mentality and beliefs, there is NO WAY in the normal cognitive patterns of the human mind that they cannot let their personal beliefs affect their personal decisions.

Judge Paul Maughn was wrong and right in his judicial rulings. He was wrong when he supposed that active LDS judges can remain completely non-biased. He was right to recuse himself. :-)

What about the countless decisions that LDS politicians and powerful bureaucrats make on a daily basis that affect the lives of other people? How can a logical person suppose that they can set aside their personal religious beliefs, i.e., that they are guided by God Himself and that they receive an answer to their prayers from God, to make unbiased and unprejudiced decisions that affect the lives of others?

They cannot.

That's where this MWAW can help.

This work proves beyond any doubt that the "priesthood of God" claimed by the LDS people was first, never intended to be what it has become, and second, when the LDS people pray to God "with the "words of their mouth," they are answered ONLY by their own minds, because our mutual Creators have nothing to do with a protocol of inequality that gives preferential treatment to any mortal.

The proof that this MWAW can do this is proven in the way that it has changed the attitude and perception of the LDS members who have read the books associated with this work. Each of them once believed that they had the "power of the priesthood" and the ability to receive revelation directly from God. Because of this work, they no longer believe this. Because of this work, they have become less biased, more full of love and acceptance for all other humans. Because of this work, they have been set FREE!

The non-LDS public and the media cannot possibly understand how this MWAW changes a person's mental state into a more "normal" and acceptable frame of mind that creates more freedom and equality for all. But it cannot deny that there is no other work upon this earth that has done this. Sure, there are many other things that can convince a person who has left the LDS faith that he or she was justified in doing so, but none other can convince an ACTIVE, TEMPLE-ENDOWED LDS member that their beliefs are not real truth.

The public and media should take note.

If they do not,

Then they must deal with the consequences of a religious belief system that has the ability to affect the free will of all the inhabitants of the earth.

Investigate this work. Intensely interview those who have embraced it.

My claims are not any different than Joseph Smith's.

If he was who claimed to be, then I am also who I claim to be.

If he is not who he claimed to be, then I am not who I claim to be.

But if the latter is what you accept as truth (and more than likely it is), then consider the reality of what this MWAW actually does for this world in comparison to what Joseph Smith did for the world. I can assure you that when you understand the real truth behind Joseph's mission, you will understand mine. :-)

:-)

C. :-)